|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 20
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 20 |
Hi!
Two questions:
1)We currently have both the KX-TA624 and TVS-50 working for one business. Currently, ext 107 (jack 7), and ext. 108 (jack 8) go to port 1 and port 2 on the TVS-50. I wanted to move voice mail from jack 8 to jack 15, but when I do it doesn't work. I've reconfigured Voice Mail 1 from Port 7 & 8 to just port 7 (after first disabling), then Voice Mail 2 to Port 15. port 7/ext 7 works fine, but 115 stays busy.
2)I read that changing extensions so that they do not match the 'jack number' is a pain. I can access the cables to switch the jacks at the KX. Is there any reason why it wouldn't make sense to re-wire the jacks to so they represent a more logical extension order?
Thanks!
Kevin
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,116
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,116 |
There is no harm or foul in changing flexible ext
numbering if you document it. That's why they are called "flexible". Back in the day I'd renumber jack 07 and 08 on a small 3x6X2 install as 165+166 . Then if I added an expansion card later you could keep numbering exts logically ...I even made jack 01 100 and 0 . I hate 101 being the operator.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 20
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 20 |
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,287
Posts638,791
Members49,767
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
1 members (Touch Tone Tommy),
90
guests, and
170
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
