|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,940 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,940 Likes: 2 |
To answer Ed's question, AT&T gear that understood NI-1 and NI-2 was never the issue. It was AT&T's older "Custom" protocol that was a very minor hurdle for DMS. The old saw was to ask the switch guy to use NTNAPRI and set the sub-trunk L1 Flag to yes. My stuff would be optioned as DMS100.
"Carry others as you climb" -- Tim Alberstein
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics93,819
Posts636,736
Members49,641
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
2 members (Ro, juno),
91
guests, and
17
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
