|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 253
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 253 |
Can you put a PRI T-1 line into a channel bank and breakout to DID and Loop Lines to a Norstar system? Has anyone ever tried this? Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 766
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 766 |
I've never seen one. But if it does exist it would be more of a switch than a channel bank. It would need to translate the ISDN to dtmf and if it did that what would the piont be in having PRI. On top of a expensive equipment tranlating protocols you would loose a ds0.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,711 Likes: 11
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,711 Likes: 11 |
Just to add to SST. A channel bank breaks the T1 down to single channel with single channel signaling, so it wouldn't work with a D channel. Also have to agree with "what's the point" even if it could be done you'd loose the functionality of the PRI. Bill
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 253
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 253 |
That's what I was looking for, I knew it couldn't work, but not why...Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 51
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 51 |
The company you want to look into is Vina Technologies (now larscom). They have a product that might suit your needs. Their equipment is very good and I have used it in the field for years. here is a link: https://www.larscom.com/specs/elink400.html ------------------ Tim Payson https://www.cobotyx.com
Tim Payson Progressive Consulting Henniker, NH 03242 (602) 315-5194
"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill" - Lao Tzu
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,096
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,096 |
On the pri note, I understand t1 but pri is a bit confusing, dont I still get 23 B channels to work with and is it better to go with 10 instead of 4 digit numbers when recieving from telco ?? thanks for the input in advance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,482 Likes: 13
Admin
|
Admin
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,482 Likes: 13 |
I don't see any advantage to receiving 10 digits - 3 or 4 should be just fine. I personally like to make DN's the same as the received digits whenever possible.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,141 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,141 Likes: 2 |
You apparently have never worked on large networked phone systems then. Seven digits is about the minimum IMHO you want to recieve as you may have over-lapping DID ranges.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,141 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,141 Likes: 2 |
PRI strips the 24th channel out for signaling Q9.31. This "digital" channel actually talks to the CO allowing you to do many things like pre-empting calls..ie before the call is placed and uses a channel the data stream checks. Caller id in and out, and manipulation thereof. Faster start and stop. Immediate notification of failure unlike just a T1. Ability to use channels for incomming and outgoing at 64k sampling. Ability to strip out BRI for video teleconferencing or routers. Remember, PRI is simply software that "rides" a T1.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,096
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,096 |
Thanks for the input you are correct about the 7 digit if overlapping becomes an issue but I dont think in my instance it will make much of an impact, this company is not going to get larger than 150 and I think to save on the key punching I will let the co send 4 digits. If I do find myself with a bigger job I will use your advice. Thanks again...... Richey
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics93,884
Posts637,026
Members49,676
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
2 members (BobRobert, Toner),
60
guests, and
16
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|