Caller ID from Cell Phones - 06/24/15 11:57 AM
Got a call yesterday from a customer that I installed an SBX for a couple weeks ago. Upgraded from an Executech XE. He got CID on the lines about a week ago. Called and wanted to know why about half of the cell phone calls just say "Wireless Caller"?
I have noticed on my CID that if the customer is ATT, there is a name with the info, if it is Verizon, it says wireless. Never really gave it much thought until he vented his frustration. Not sure how T-Mobile and Sprint handle this issue, but here there is only basically service from ATT and Verizon. Anyone know why this would be? Seems kind of dumb now that I think about it.
My neighbor (retired guy) across the street uses a Tracfone, and his name appeared with the number. About 2 weeks ago, he got some kind of smartphone from Tracfone, and they transferred his service. Now when he calls, the CID also says wireless, so I suspect that the new phone is CDMA instead of GSM, requiring a switch to VZN.
Anyway now I've got that off my chest!, but if ATT can give names, how come VZN doesn't. With everyone moving to cells, might as well not even pay for the CID.
I have noticed on my CID that if the customer is ATT, there is a name with the info, if it is Verizon, it says wireless. Never really gave it much thought until he vented his frustration. Not sure how T-Mobile and Sprint handle this issue, but here there is only basically service from ATT and Verizon. Anyone know why this would be? Seems kind of dumb now that I think about it.
My neighbor (retired guy) across the street uses a Tracfone, and his name appeared with the number. About 2 weeks ago, he got some kind of smartphone from Tracfone, and they transferred his service. Now when he calls, the CID also says wireless, so I suspect that the new phone is CDMA instead of GSM, requiring a switch to VZN.
Anyway now I've got that off my chest!, but if ATT can give names, how come VZN doesn't. With everyone moving to cells, might as well not even pay for the CID.