|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049 |
We had Major PRI'S failure today due to a PS failure on a DSU Node . We are suppose to have secondary rerouting to alternitive PRI'S if SBC/ATT sees that our PRI'S fail to respond . Can anyone tell me why the AT&T secondary reroute would not work until I disconnected the rj45 from each PRI interface module ? 
Let It Be , I live in a Yellow Submarine . SCCE
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,742 Likes: 32
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,742 Likes: 32 |
What was your failure? If a T-1 signal was still present it wouldn't switch. That's what it sounds like to me, you unplug, kill the signal it switches, but didn't on it's own. That sounds like your PRI failed but not the T-1. That's just a guess as to what might have happened.
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049 |
The failure was the cabinent power supply . Eight PRI'S kaput until I unplugged the cables . The D channel had to of been down .
Let It Be , I live in a Yellow Submarine . SCCE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,742 Likes: 32
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,742 Likes: 32 |
The only protection I ever worked on was the protection switches on the T-1. That's what made me say if they didn't switch until you unplugged from the jack it sounded like the T-1 signal was still there. I've never heard of channel protection. Of course if all you lost was the D channel that would affect how every many T-1's it controlled. That's why I asked what failed.
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049 |
Yep
justbill , you are correct the failure point could determine if the PRI alt rerouted or not . That was a pertinent question . It makes one wonder about the redundancy SBC/AT&T expounds !
Let It Be , I live in a Yellow Submarine . SCCE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,722
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,722 |
"It muz be in yo pbx" Right? :shrug: KLD 
Ken
---------
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,393 Likes: 17
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
|
|
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,393 Likes: 17 |
No, no, no, Ken.
It's "mus be sumpin' wrong wich yo PBX"!
Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049 |
All I know is that "sumpin" is going to ruin my Monday ! :toast:
Let It Be , I live in a Yellow Submarine . SCCE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,742 Likes: 32
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,742 Likes: 32 |
Darrell, if your saying they couldn't determine if the T-1 was on the primary or protection route that's not the case. They can see which leg is working. If your saying T-1 was up and PRI channels were down that's another issue.
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,049 |
My question was , if sbc was not able to hand off a DID call to 916-xxx-xxxx why did they not reroute the call to the 2nd alt pri's instead of the callers hearing an OOS recording ? When I unplugged the cables the calls did start to reroute . There is no way with the bad power supply in the node that any call processing could of taken place . It is my fault for not making my post clear and to the point . 
Let It Be , I live in a Yellow Submarine . SCCE
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,490
Posts639,855
Members49,833
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|
