|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 28
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 28 |
Thanks Everyone! It WAS the phone company. They got the phone number to show up but the name still says "OUT OF AREA" they are still working on it but know it is their problem and not mine. Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,393 Likes: 17
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
|
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,393 Likes: 17 |
What RedTail was trying to tell you is that in order for the caller information to pass through the many switches (sometimes referred to as central offices), the switches all must speak the same language.
The standard "language" is SS7 (Signaling System 7) developed about 20 years ago. Still, a call might travel through a switch that is not equipped for SS7, thus losing the call information.
You might simply make a call across the street, yet the call may travel halfway across the country and back. This is especially true when your service is provided by a competitor (CLEC) that doesn't have "neighborhood" central offices; rather switches in major cities only. A phone call may pass through many switches and any one of them may cause caller data to be lost.
Still, the fact that your problem was constant, not just occasionally, was likely due to the local central office as you have found. We have also found that outgoing caller ID information can be lost-here goes:
We spent weeks trying to explain why a customer in DC who called his mother in upstate NY, it would display "OUT OF AREA", yet anyone else calling her had their name show up just fine, even when calling from other DC numbers.
It turned up being an issue in a switch run by QWEST in Colorado! QWEST was not the carrier for the originator OR the recipient of the call! They were just a contractor handling a portion of the call between Washington, DC and New York. Strange but true.
------------------ Ed --------- How come there's always enough time to go back and fix it a second time?
Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,490
Posts639,857
Members49,833
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
1 members (Toner),
684
guests, and
137
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|