web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#14516 01/17/07 05:46 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
The organization that I work for purchased a VOIP system. For the most part it works fine. The features available are comparable to a traditional system. It has a few extra features but it is also missing a few features that traditional systems have. My gut feeling is that a traditional system would have been a lot less expensive. Based on this and on the location that you described, the traditional system would be my choice hands down.


Gary
Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

#14517 01/17/07 07:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
From what I can glean in this forum and others, it seems that;

1. Mixing voice and data on one wire is an invitation to voice quality problems (dropouts, garbling, etc.). Voice traffic isn't so likely to interfere with data traffic in a noticeable way, but data traffic can affect voice packet delivery. A lot of posts seem to indicate that "the new XX VoIP system works fine, except for network issues."

2. The overall volume of data traffic is not so likely to cause problems in voice delivery as the data packet traffic travelling in unpredictable bursts.

3. For an internal VoIP system, it is best to have separate cable and switch infrastructure to handle the voice traffic rather than relying on a single wire.

4. The best justification for pure VoIP is multiple office sites or off-site workers, but hybrid systems can do the same job by including a point-to-point IP or VPN connection.

Are these fair restatements?

#14518 01/17/07 10:36 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,344
Likes: 3
Member
***
Offline
Member
***
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,344
Likes: 3
For an internal VoIP system, it is best to have separate cable and switch infrastructure to handle the voice traffic rather than relying on a single wire.

Right, but that is kind of silly considering it will need switches and CAT 5 cable not to mention the additional cost of the IP system itself.

A traditional or hybrid system only needs wire and cheaper CAT3 at that which may even be existing.

-Hal


CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
#14519 01/22/07 05:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,436
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,436
VoIP has it's applications, but generally a traditional system will be more cost-effective and reliable. Get one that you can add VoIP to later if you decide you have a need for it.


Joe
---
No trees were harmed as a result of this posting; however, many electrons were severely inconvenienced.
#14520 02/13/07 04:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 176
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 176
I disagree with all of you gents, VoIP is here to stay. You can find IP PBX's that actually cost less than legacy systems.

For the most part you can run your voice and data on a single wire system there are always variables but unless you are moving massive files accross your network it can be accomplished quite easily, we actually have deployed WiFi voice and data networks which has much less bandwidth than a cable network.

#14521 02/13/07 05:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,160
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,160
"Looking for opinions, articles, previous posts, and/or snide remarks."

I've invented a new wheel, it's more round then the traditional wheel and less costly to use, well, usually. It does not have 99.999% up time, it sometimes loses air for no reason, we believe this added downtime will enhance it's life expectancy by years. Buy now while the government is not taxing it's use. We also offer a hybrid which continues to work when the hi tech wheel doesn't, well, usually. The sooner we all upgrade to the new wheel, the sooner the government can tax it's use.

#14522 02/13/07 06:23 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,267
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,267
Quote
Originally posted by Milestone:
I disagree with all of you gents, VoIP is here to stay. You can find IP PBX's that actually cost less than legacy systems.

For the most part you can run your voice and data on a single wire system there are always variables but unless you are moving massive files accross your network it can be accomplished quite easily, we actually have deployed WiFi voice and data networks which has much less bandwidth than a cable network.
I agree that now that the general person has gotten used to "cell phone quality" voice transmission that VOIP will continue to spread.
Yes, you can create a VOIP system that, in theory, is as reliable and works as well as a traditional phone system. The trouble is that I have never heard a fully voip system in place that did not suffer from frequent transmit quality issues. Nor have I heard of any network that does not require a full reboot every couple of weeks.
I do know of many large traditional phone systems that have been up 24/7 for years with no down time at all.
While I agree that, because of the propoganda from companies like Cisco, Avaya, and Microsoft, we will continue to see VOIP spread, I simply see it as being to the detriment of the people who actually use their telephones to conduct business.

#14523 02/13/07 01:07 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 431
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 431
As my record on this board indicates I am a proponent of VOIP. That said, I will be the first to admit that voip pbx system mfg's have some ways to go in terms of adding features and functions to be able to play with the big boys.

But, this is surely is a joke!?

QUOTE]The trouble is that I have never heard a fully voip system in place that did not suffer from frequent transmit quality issues. Nor have I heard of any network that does not require a full reboot every couple of weeks.
[/QB][/QUOTE]
:rofl: Again I KNOW that voip has problems and it is WAY over sold, but really the straw-men being thrown around on this board about voip sometimes is just crazy.

OK, Flame away

#14524 02/13/07 01:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,159
Likes: 17
Admin
*****
Offline
Admin
*****
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,159
Likes: 17
I was in a Bank Of America branch today doing business. Noticed they had a new Cisco IP system instead of the old familiar Norstar system. While sitting there I had my banker try to call someone in California. She picked up her handset and somehow picked up an incoming call. She's not the receptionist. Says it happens all the time. I talked to a rep in California. The popping and clicking on the call was incredible. Says it's been that way since the install. We put the call on hold and promptly lost it. Everyone in the office hates the system. I can give you the contact info for two former Cisco resellers that had to reset their systems EVERY night. Again I have sold them and I have pulled them out. I like VoIP as transport between sites and teleworkers but inside to the desktop still sucks. We pulled another hosted IP system as the sellers could never make it work.


[Linked Image]
#14525 02/13/07 01:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
From a carrier point of view...

I see a lot more companies going to a least some form of a VOIP solution. I also see a LOT more trouble tickets coming in from customers using VOIP. 90 % of the time the out come is CPE, the resolution is "Customer rebooted their router, and gateway and switch" Or Customers router was misconfigured.

I do not have an issue with VOIP, I have an issue with under qualified people who have never seen a phone room and take a two week certification class and are now so called techs installing systems, and IT managers who have no Idea of how a PRI works or even the basics of telecom for that matter who will argue with you for hours over something they have absolutely no understanding of.

I think if all the IT guys out their with the “I know everything” complex would swallow their pride and listen to some of us dumb old phone guys they may actually learn something. Incidentally from the IT guys I have come in contact with, the ones who seem to be able to get their VOIP system to work properly all started off as phone guys


I Swear I did not touch anything bash
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  MooreTel 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,298
Posts638,870
Members49,769
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
212,717 Shoretel
189,755 CTX100 install
187,919 1a2 system
Newest Members
Soulece, Robbks, A2A Networks, James D., Nadisale
49,768 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 27
teleco 9
dans 6
dexman 4
Who's Online Now
1 members (Toner), 127 guests, and 358 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998-2024
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5