|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,362
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,362 |
I would try two rings on the AA instead of 1 and check your line supervision settings. It sounds as if the AA is doing its' job, answering on the short ring, playing a greeting to dead air, then after no response, transferring it to the attendant.
(edit) Bunnie, I deleted your duplicate posts in this thread. I think the board Gremlins caught up with you.
|
|
|
Nortel Phone System Service in Canada
Do you need a Nortel Phone System technician or specific Nortel parts?
Atcom to the rescue! Our telephone techs have qualified experience servicing and troubleshooting Nortel CICS, MICS, & BCM telephone systems.
Service in Canada from sea to sea.
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,184
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,184 |
Yep, I think Johnyreb is right. Up the AA rings to answer on. It's picking up that 1/2 ring and we all know that Nortel ring settings don't count real well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,184
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,184 |
Just thinking here, they're not using a "service setting" in addition to forwarding that line at lunch are they? For example, if they are using a "night service" the AA is even ignoring your 1 ring setting and answering right away then forwarding to attendant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,685 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,685 Likes: 4 |
Be sure disconnect supervision is set to yes. No DS will cause the AA to answer and operator station to ring on abandoned calls.
Marv CCNA, CTUB TeleMarv Services (Retired) Providing telecommunication solutions in Ottawa Canada since 1990
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,869
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,869 |
Thanks Johnyreb, with all the timeout problems that started it could have been in there a half dozen times, I never knew if it went in and then timed out or never went in. Thank goodness the board is not doing that anymore.
I would certainly like to find out if any of this worked and which one.
THE Bracha, old blond specialist in Rube Goldberg solutions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 145 |
Thanks all....I was forbidden to post and then the board was down......
A recent surgery put this little problem on the back burner for me for a few days, I'll be back dealing with it next week and let you know how we make out.
Bonnie you should buy McGyvers name from him, you really do some of the things you post????
BEth
Communication Essentials Newton, NJ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,869
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,869 |
John, I AM the woman your mother warned you about. I never make promises I don't keep, and I can be very, very scary but then some people like that and some people are afraid to think about being scared. To each their own.
That said, when I thought telemarv said it couldn't be done, I came up with my mechanical out of the box suggestions.
If they don't have caller ID, you could set the lines to Caller ID and that would give you a delay of one to one and a half ring cycles, perhaps that would solve the problem.
They would have that one cycle delay all the time but it might not be objectionable to them.
THE Bracha, old blond specialist in Rube Goldberg solutions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 145
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 145 |
The solution.........I took the path of least resistance and had them put the attendent phone on DND when it is call forwarded to the ansering serive. Not fancy, not a fix (Sprint can't figure it out and I don't have tech time to waste for vendor meets right now) but it gets rid of the chirp and that was the goal!
Beth
Communication Essentials Newton, NJ
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,534
Posts640,048
Members49,854
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
1 members (Yoda),
517
guests, and
38
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|