web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 860
Member
*****
Member
*****
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 860
-187 volts vDC… That there would be an OLD delivery method of ISDN BRI. Referred to as Bridal-C / Bridal-R … I could very well be wrong but, I don’t recall HDSL ever being THAT high of a voltage range even in its early stages.


-----------------------
Bryan
LEC Provisioning Engineer
Cars -n- Guitars Racin' (retired racer Oct.'07)
Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,059
Likes: 6
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
*****
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
*****
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,059
Likes: 6
Carrier (N or T)- power was in the 130 - 180 volt range, depending on the CO and the equipment.


"Where are we going and why are we in this hand basket?"
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 539
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 539
Quote
Originally posted by bf6b5yr:
We just wired red to ring, green to tip, and yellow to ground. The C.O. had a coin appliqué circuit that send the collect and refund voltages. A coin relay in the pay phone operated one way to dump the coin into the box and the other way to drop the coin into the refund chute.
I was thinking more along the lines of how the wiring inside the phone itself was arranged to avoid unbalancing the line with the collect/return solenoids.

By the way, was this arrangement only ever used on the old 3-slot coinphones or was it employed on the single-slotters as well? I seem to recall seeing mention of some U.S. coinphones using a dual-tone signal to activate collect or return.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
By the way, was this arrangement only ever used on the old 3-slot coinphones or was it employed on the single-slotters as well? I seem to recall seeing mention of some U.S. coinphones using a dual-tone signal to activate collect or return.

I can’t say for certain but I believe the answer is yes. I recall working on the old 3 slot phones and the single slot phones during the same period and within the same C.O. area. I don’t remember the C.O. doing anything different when I converted from a 3 slot to a single slot. Again, I’m not totally certain. We’re talking 35 years ago.


Gary
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397
Likes: 17
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
*****
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
*****
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397
Likes: 17
Tones were sent toward the central office by the single-slot coin phones to indicate the denomination of the coin being deposited. In the old three-slot units, the coins hit the edge of a brass bell and made either a single, double or triple "ding" that was heard by the operator or by the CO detection equipment.

Coin collection/return was always handled by the 130 volts to ground setup.


Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
That’s correct. Sometimes we’d find a coin chute jammed with coins or we find coins within the upper housing of the pay phone. We’d have to contact the operator and deposit these coins manually. She’d identify the coin by tone and then collect them via the 130 volts.


Gary
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 539
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 539
Thanks for the recollections. Can anyone remember which polarity did what, i.e. positive for collect, negative for return or vice versa? Applied to tip or ring side of the line?

Quote
made either a single, double or triple "ding"
I knew that the single-slot units used tone signaling to the C.O. (despite the sound-effects departments in TV & the movies insisting on dubbing bell sounds over them!) but I thought the older 3-slot phones had some sort of wire gong for the quarter -- "ding" for a nickel, "ding ding" for a dime, "clang" for a quarter. Am I off-base on that?

Similar bell signals were used on the old British pre-pay phones as well for the benefit of operators: "Clang" on the wire gong was a penny, "ding" for 6d., "ding ding" for a shilling (double the value of 6d.), if I recall correctly. The post-payment boxes went to electrical signaling.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397
Likes: 17
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
*****
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
*****
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397
Likes: 17
You are correct. There was a wire coiled in a spiral that made more of a "dong" sound when the quarter hit it.

I can't remember which way it went, but I am pretty sure that 130 volts from Tip to ground was the "return" and Ring to ground was "collect".

Some of the independent telcos here had post pay phones, meaning that you would actually dial the complete call but the called party could not hear you until you made the coin deposit. These were obviously not very intelligent setups since there was no way to receive a refund. It was up to the caller to make sure that they had reached the correct number before depositing any coins.

There were also pay phones that did not return dial tone until coins were deposited. This concept wasn't a very good idea since the line could be dead and the customer wouldn't know until they threw their money away. With a dead line, of course the phone didn't have the ability to return the money. They didn't last very long using this type of arrangement.


Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,516
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,516
This is interesting. I've always wondered how the signaling, coin totalizing, and testing worked for the earlier style payphones. smile I maintained/vended Protel COCOTs (with the Elcotel Series 5 boards) a few years ago, and other than a placing a regular test call and a coin verification test, most of my other testing was accomplished by using telemetry codes.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 539
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 539
Quote
Originally posted by ev607797:
Some of the independent telcos here had post pay phones {.....} There were also pay phones that did not return dial tone until coins were deposited.
Here's the way it worked in England (for anyone interested enough in the history!).

The older pre-pay boxes gave dialtone as soon as you picked up the handset, but contacts on the coin mechanism kept the dial shorted out until the correct amount for a local call had been deposited. The first coin going into the mechanism also applied a short across the transmitter, so after depositing the correct amount the caller could dial the number and hear his party answer, but could not talk.

As I mentioned above, coin control was under the sole control of the caller. Upon hearing an answer he had to press button "A" on the front of the phone which deposited the coins into the box and restored all the coin contacts to normal so that he could speak. If there was no answer, the wrong number, busy, etc. he pressed button "B" on the side of the box which dumped the coins into the return chute. The dial and transmitter contacts were restored to normal, but this button also operated a small spring-wound timer contact which opened the line for a few seconds to clear down any connection.

An extra set of contacts was fitted to the dial which opened when it was rotated right round to zero and didn't close again until it returned to rest. These were wired in series with the coin mechanism contacts which shorted out the dial, and thus allowed the caller to dial zero for operator without depositing any coins. After preparing the call, the operator would, of course, ask for the correct amount.

The contacts which shorted out the handset transmitter were changeover types and actually switched between the handset and a small carbon transmitter fitted inside the box. The first coin going into the slot therefore muted the main transmitter and turned on the coin transmitter so that the operator could hear the bell/gong signals from both that and any subsequent coins. From then on the call went as before, with the caller having to press button "A" if successful or button "B" to get his money back. There was no way to speak to the operator again without releasing the coin contacts, so any repeat attempts had to be made by pressing "B" to clear the call and then starting over.

The fact that the handset transmitter was "live" until the first coin was deposited also meant that the phone would accept incoming calls easily. The special dial contacts were adjusted to allow a 9 to be dialed as well as a zero after the 999 emergency service came into operation.

The post-pay phones which came in after STD arrived in the late 1950s/1960s were quite different, as they had been designed to allow fully automatic, direct-dialed long-distance calls without operator intervention. The coin slots had a restricting lock which was released by a solenoid, so you could not deposit coins at all until the C.O. equipment allowed it. Once a coin was pushed (and I do mean pushed and not dropped -- you had to press fairly hard) into the mechanism, it went through the detectors and straight into the box with no way of returning it (the return chute was purely to catch and reject damaged or otherwise unacceptable coins).

You could pick up and dial any call, local or long-distance (once available in the area) with no coin deposit. When answer supervision was returned from the distant end, the C.O. would open the slots and apply "pay tone" to the line (heard by both parties) to signal that a deposit was now required. The signal returned from the phone to the C.O. then allowed the call to proceed based upon whatever time interval was allowed for the particular call. When the time expired, the coinbox relay sets then repeated the process to ask for more money.

If coins were not deposited within a few seconds the connection was dropped and the slots locked again.

The pre-pay A/B phones were mostly displaced as STD spread throughout the country, although there was at least one still in use (in a remote part of Scotland) in the 1980s. The post-pay boxes were pretty much the standard through the 1970s. They too were phased out during the 1980s as the modern microprocessor controlled units started to take over.

Edited to add:

You can see the old pre- and post-payment phones here (about a third of the way down the page):

https://www.telephonesuk.co.uk/kiosks_payphones.htm

The A/B boxes are obvious; the 705/735 are the post-pay phones that I described above. There are internal views of a couple.

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  MooreTel 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Topics
Samsung xchange server
by scanjet - 04/07/25 06:37 PM
NEC IP Phones
by juno - 04/04/25 09:05 AM
NEC IP phones rebooting
by jpet621 - 04/03/25 03:03 PM
SV9100 store hours mailbox
by muddybl - 04/03/25 02:10 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,513
Posts639,937
Members49,844
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Newest Members
yeloshak, ty3995, Sippy, sersmith, Taddeo
49,844 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 8
Taddeo 5
dexman 3
Who's Online Now
1 members (PhoneGuy827), 289 guests, and 45 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998 - 2025
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0