Really depends on how the network is set-up to deliver xDSL for a customer’s area on what else is hooked up on the pair with an “naked DSL service.†... I’ve heard about every scenario you could imagine.
* LEN to DSLAM splitter just like a normal POTS + DSL service except the switch port is programmed for no inbound and outbound 911 only calls. (Just like if it had been disco-ed for no pay.)
* A combo card (LEN + DSLAM.) where the LEN can be programmed same as above.
* A combo card (LEN + DSLAM.) Where the LEN is set as a pseudo-LEN (a software marker of sorts) and the LEN is programmed to a null value, so as far as the actual switcher is concerned there’s no LEN there.
* I have never seen one used ‘round here, but I also understand there are DSLAMs (either modules of Next-Gen pair gain cards) that are set-up to supply battery too, so lines can be set up DSLAM to cable-pair specifically for naked DSL.
What you’re gonna get when connecting a tel-set or butt set to a dry DSL line and going off hook, is going to result in about anything you could image. :shrug:
Originally posted by jeffmoss26:
I don't see them a lot anymore, but used to...they often had a tag that said TXNU.
That’s an ckt id for a CLEC leased broadband capable loop... Possible that “naked†or “dry†xDSL is being delivered on it but a LEC provided xDSL loop will not have a circuit id.