|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,552
Moderator-Comdial, ESI, Voicemail, Cisco
|
OP
Moderator-Comdial, ESI, Voicemail, Cisco
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,552 |
Okay, because the 17F software is labeled for 112-port, and the single-backplane FXT is 112 ports, I tried loading the 17F software. The key let me do it, and it loaded up okay. I've seen in other cases, where the port count was wrong (e.g., trying to put 480 software on a system with 2 backplanes), the key would reject the software. So, now I'm wondering: does anyone know if this version is actually compatable with the FXT, or if I need to go back to the last version listed on the CCC under FXT: 17D (the earlier of the two versions of 17D). The reason I'm asking is because of the new problems I've picked up on an FXT, referenced in this thread . Thanks, in advance, for the input. Justin
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,159 Likes: 16
Admin
|
Admin
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,159 Likes: 16 |
Any system that will take 17A will take 17F as that was a maintenance update not a level update.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,552
Moderator-Comdial, ESI, Voicemail, Cisco
|
OP
Moderator-Comdial, ESI, Voicemail, Cisco
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,552 |
What's the difference between the 112 and 480 port versions, then. Keying?
True, I found a 17F version for 96 (labeled as 112) and for 480 (since they are for FXII), but what would I be able to do if I had a FXT 224 or 464? If you go back and look at the software for FXS/FXT, it was different for 112, 224, and 464.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,287
Posts638,784
Members49,767
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
1 members (Toner),
132
guests, and
164
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|