web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 395
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 395
I'm pretty sure this is a carrier issue, but wanted to check here to see if anyone has ever had this problem on a Samsung. I have a customer with a recently installed 7100 w/pri that has one phone with a DID number pointed at it, and an 800 number attached to that DID. When you call the DID, you get CID info. When you call the 800 number, you don't get any CID info. Carrier is Cbeyond and they say its the Samsung. Samsung tech support says its Cbeyond, which is what I think. Anyone seen this before because I sure haven't.

Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,869
Member
****
Member
****
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,869
One assumes you have put in the last so many digits of the 800 number as well as the last so many digits of the DID number.

Ask them what digits they are sending you when the 800 number rings and see if it is programmed in MMC 714. They could have told you what digits they were sending.

Of all the carriers out there CBeyond is the least helpful, most clueless I have ever worked with. I got three emails to show up to cut over one of my customers to their stuff, the tech never showed up, the order was canceled and they stiffed me on paying for my time to show up.

I've never had a cut go smooth with them so don't feel pregnant.

Of all the carriers out there, they are the ones that want to blame someone else and charge the most and have the most aggressive salespeople.


THE Bracha, old blond specialist in Rube Goldberg solutions.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 395
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 395
Bringing this back up since a solution was found finally. The simple answer is the Samsung NI2 default setting for the PRI doesn't like the Cisco 2431 IAD's "NI2 standard" setting. All I did was change the Samsung to its "5ESS5" setting and all is good. The "Invalid information element contents" error message we had been getting in the D-channel trace when the 800 number was called went away and CID started working correctly.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,173
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,173
That's great MichealV. When we run into problems like that we start changing the PRI parameters and testing. Even if what we set it to is different than the supposed setting specified by the carrier.


Moderated by  nameless, pvj 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Topics
tempo lan toner 2
by davetel - 07/14/25 01:37 AM
Admin Program for XTS Systems
by EV607797 - 07/11/25 10:22 AM
Compatibility with Verizon FIOS phone lines
by ringtone - 07/10/25 03:23 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,565
Posts640,180
Members49,869
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Newest Members
LuigiE, FranzBos, Chuck Lowe, Ma Bell Brat, Shadowchan454
49,869 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 13
R4+Z 4
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 15 guests, and 52 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998 - 2025
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0