I have no problem with the codes. It's the negative press I've seen the last few months. All of it pointing at low-volt installers as being 90% of the problem in firewall breaches. Obviously, the IBEW stands to gain by taking that stance, as it does by lobbying for laws requiring ALL cabling to be installed by licensed electricians.
I was just curious as to what others do when there are existing gaping holes with cabling running through them. It seems silly to route through a firestop product just a few feet away from an obvious breach.
Of course, selling your services to properly firestop the earlier damage seems like it might be profitable. I wonder how many customers would even care about all those holes once they saw the costs to repair, though.
The worst I've seen would have to be places where some dope removed several concrete blocks from a wall, creating an 18" hole. We're way beyond worrying about fire protection there!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by hbiss:
I have no love for the IBEW but I don't think you can blame them for making the codes.
And it's not just us. Any trade that "makes holes" is required to firestop them and that is not only for commercial but residential also.
I know what you are saying, you do a job in a place and there are holes all over. Unfortunately you are doing new work and you have to comply with the current code. Doesn't matter what else is there.
-Hal </font>
[This message has been edited by UpstateNetworks (edited July 08, 2005).]