web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#472894 07/23/09 03:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 20
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 20
The purpose of the server with ShoreTel is for Voice Mail, AA, desktop tools, & the management of the system. All the call processing is done on the switches (transfer, conference, etc) If you lose your server you are still able to make and receive phone calls.

Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

#472895 07/23/09 11:15 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 426
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 426
Shore Tel is it a hosted IP service? Wasnt they going broke at one time?

#472896 07/23/09 04:20 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 75
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 75
No, ShoreTel is not a hosted IP service. And all the big players are server-based. (need someone smarter than me to address a larger base.) Whiteywhite is correct in that most of the call processing is done locally, and DR (disaster recovery) is not difficult to engineer-in.

#472897 10/17/09 10:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19
Quote
Originally posted by Coral Tech:
Look at the NEC UX5000 series VOIP...very slick cost effective system.

www.ux5000.com
The real one is the SV8100. lol. Both the same, NEC Nitsiko division.

No good NAT transversal yet

#472898 10/18/09 01:21 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 582
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 582
Cisco UC520 the best Unified Communications system on the market.

None better for quality, price, client growth and margins!

It will be the future of SMB telephony, networking, security, video and IP applications.

#472899 10/18/09 06:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 2
Member
*****
Offline
Member
*****
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 2
Quote
Originally posted by Mike Bardsley:
Quote
Originally posted by Coral Tech:
[b] Look at the NEC UX5000 series VOIP...very slick cost effective system.

www.ux5000.com
The real one is the SV8100. lol. Both the same, NEC Nitsiko division.

No good NAT transversal yet [/b]
What? The UX5000 has had both software and hardware NAT translation for some time now. Both I have had working flawlessly.

#472900 11/11/09 04:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 75
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 75
The UX and SV are great for any solution. We deploy the Asterisk on our Hosted service we offer clients. If you want the bells and whistle PC attdt, etc. UX or SV is the way to go for a smart price. Shortel did not go broke, they changed their name to Shortel and borrowed a BUTTLOAD of money, still aren't doing very well.

#472901 01/04/10 08:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 23
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 23
Shoretel is a great system if you want to pay $1000+ a seat for MGCP stations... They do have a great call manager application but the licensing is insane and you have to pay for support on a yearly contract. Shoretel does have remote survivability which the NEC products really don't have. With the UX and Cygnilink or the SV and Netlink both can only have one voicemail for a distributed system. Kind of sucks but the price point is hard to beat for networking. oh and Mike don't kid yourself.. the UX and the SV are the EXACT SAME SYSTEM..i have two networked together right now. same hardware different voicemails and phones.. i think the only appreciable difference is the UX phones have a call 1 and call 2 key on the phone so you don't have to burn up real estate for CAP keys.. SV has better voicemail.. thats about the only difference.


"If I can't fix it, I'll fix it so that no one else can"
#472902 01/04/10 04:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
How does the Shoretel handle call routing via the auto attendant if the Voicemail server goes down? I would think that would effect call routing if the voicemail handles the AA, and it goes down, even if the system is set up to route calls in the event of the voicemail being down.

I have worked installs on ESI, panasonic, toshiba, shoretel, and avaya, plus others, and I like the avaya reliability, scalability, and the huge network of support which shoretel simply does not have considering it is so much smaller company with so greatly fewer authorized dealers, and support engineers.


I can not recommend any technology platform, only technicians!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,291
Posts638,815
Members49,767
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
212,400 Shoretel
189,148 CTX100 install
187,423 1a2 system
Newest Members
Robbks, A2A Networks, James D., Nadisale, andreww
49,767 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 26
teleco 6
dexman 5
jsaad 4
dans 3
Who's Online Now
1 members (Bob3470), 152 guests, and 434 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998-2024
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5