web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#477064 01/30/08 10:47 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 185
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 185
I have a customer that manually forwards their 4 POTS lines to an answer service when they go home at night. They do the *72 the target number wait for the message and then hang up. After you fwd all the numbers you can check them by dialing each 10 digit number and they do go to the answer service. Problem, at random times during the after hours they just un-fwd? I have verified the CO is a 5 ESS and is current. Call fwd is on all 4 lines. This happens at random and the fwd dropping can happen on any of the 4 lines. Any ideas???????

Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

#477065 01/30/08 11:10 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,516
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,516
A random *73 signaling is somehow being emulated and received back at the provider. Is is possible to forward the four lines to a different destination or system, to test if the source of this trouble can be isolated to the device that the calls are currently being forwarded to? I've personally never encountered any type of random auto-deactivating of call forwarding.

#477066 01/30/08 02:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 185
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 185
I kind of think that maybe there is something in the provisioning of the lines that is the issue. Condition #1 =.... + condition #2 =.... makes for a dropped forward condition. Maybe 2 calls at the same time???

#477067 01/30/08 04:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Member
*****
Member
*****
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Sometimes during the night, electronic CO software gets updated, and individual lines' "short-term memory" (sorry, not being an ESS switchman I do not know the exact terminology) gets lost or over-written. I have encountered it in my job as a repairman with VZ, in the distant past.


Arthur P. Bloom
"30 years of faithful service...15 years on hold"

#477068 01/30/08 04:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,401
Likes: 18
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
*****
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
*****
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,401
Likes: 18
Are you sure that the forwarding stops working? The reason that I ask is that call forwarding-variable (*72)used to be a spring board that bounced any number of calls to the forward destination without limit. Now, they charge extra for multiple call paths.

This means that the first call forwards to the answering service just fine, but the second and subsequent callers will reach a busy signal unless additional paths are paid for.


Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
#477069 01/31/08 04:07 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,928
Just curious, are the 4 lines in a hunt group? If so they would only need to fwd the main line. The only time I have come across this it turns out the csr has a speed button programmed for cfr and one to remove cfr....the overnight cleaning crew would occasionally hit the remove cfr button at night.


I Swear I did not touch anything bash
#477070 01/31/08 03:02 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 10
Moderator-Avaya-Lucent, Antique Tele
*****
Moderator-Avaya-Lucent, Antique Tele
*****
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 10
Usually only need to order "voice paths" for RCF, not varible call forward.

I have several medical clinics, that can't get the LEC to send their main BTN as CID for all of their numbers, so they have to forward each and every one of their lines to the service at night, in case someone uses *69 to return the call.

#477071 02/01/08 06:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 203
I never ran across a switch deactivating call forwarding. The exception could be a generic upgrade where recent changes did not reapply correctly. These generic changes happen infrequently.

The only time I ever encountered a call-forwarding problem related to a number of paths is what Ed mentioned. If the paths are not available you get either busy or reorder.

I would be suspect someone at the site using the phone and dialing an incorrect number that contained *73 and accidentally knocking down the forwarding. Are there others at the site that have access to the phones? A long shot question, are these lines associated with any type of remote access equipment where an outside user would dial in to a separate and seize one of the four lines in question to make an outgoing call?

The 5E has some trace capabilities that could be useful. I’m going from memory but I think you can place an AMA trace on the lines in question and it will generate record of all calls made whether they are local or long distance. There is also an interactive monitor that can be placed on the line that shows originations, digits dialed, etc. The only problem with this is that it only stays up for an hour. That may have changed. I’m betting the problem is man made.


Gary
#477072 02/01/08 06:56 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Member
*****
Member
*****
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
A dialed digit recorder on each line would quickly identify any human disabling of the CF codes.


Arthur P. Bloom
"30 years of faithful service...15 years on hold"

#477073 02/02/08 02:22 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 185
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 185
The call forward is immediate using in this case, *72. There are 3 forward pathways. Customer is using analog POTS lines so they have individual 10 digit numbers so each has to be call fwd'd. The calls drop at random on the weekends or in the middle of the night. They verify it by calling each number to test it. Verizon has checked their software, CO and we have set the fwd and made test calls. Test calls never failed. When it fails, the stuttered call fdw dial tone is gone on the main number. BTW, customer is dialing the codes and waiting on the answer from the service before hanging up, no button is involved. Still scratching my head?

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  dexman 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Topics
outdial message notification cuts off
by Bellhanger - 05/05/25 10:05 AM
3515 vodavi phones.
by Gary S. - 05/01/25 12:26 PM
AT&T Coinsoft
by ChrisRR - 04/30/25 02:39 PM
Inter-tel Encore CX aka Mitel 3000 circa 2008
by Telesystems - 04/27/25 02:20 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,525
Posts640,013
Members49,852
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Newest Members
Marcgyver, DEN2MM, ferhat_efe, utec, MoverDub
49,852 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 4
Who's Online Now
3 members (Toner, KRRath, justbill), 194 guests, and 43 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998 - 2025
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0