|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 391
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 391 |
Any favorites? I like the SonicWall TZ200 series. Not sure if I can get two of them under this budget. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 828
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 828 |
I've used several Netgear FVS series and they work fine for SCN. I've have found that there is something funky if you're trying to use QSIG over IP - but not often a trouble. And they certainly fit almost any budget...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 391
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 391 |
They sure are priced right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,949
Moderator-Avaya
|
|
Moderator-Avaya
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,949 |
SonicWall is our first choice also, but when we need a low end VPN router we use the Cisco RVO42
Avaya SMB Authorized Business Partner. ACIS/APSS ESI Certified Reseller/Installer www.regal-comm.com
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 111 Likes: 1
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 111 Likes: 1 |
Agreed with mdainel. I don't deal with Avaya stuff but SonicWall is my first choice and then a low end Cisco if the SonicWall is not needed. Netgear's speeds are extremely slow even on the ProSafe business models.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 391
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 391 |
The Cisco is looking better at the moment. I like the QoS built in better than the Netgear.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,668 Likes: 4
Moderator-Avaya
|
|
Moderator-Avaya
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,668 Likes: 4 |
Any way you go, Sonicwall or Cisco (i prefer Netgear) make sure you turn off deep packet inspection. Cisco calls it fixup on the PIX, but i dont remember the ASA term...Sonicwall does something similar..
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,515
Posts639,961
Members49,847
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
0 members (),
130
guests, and
43
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
