|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,367
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,367 |
wireshark at the phone switch port? are the reg request getting that far?
Is there a way of clearing the cache of the phone? If so, does the broadcast IP still show up?
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30 |
I defaulted a phone that I would assume would clear it out. Still pulling that forge in address. Wireshark at the phone switch port still shows that addresses. THey are not in our network.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,812 Likes: 15
Moderator-Iwatsu
|
Moderator-Iwatsu
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,812 Likes: 15 |
If the phone is getting an address of 10.0.7.whatever, it is being provided to it, if the phone is set for DHCP discovery. Te phone system won't hand out an address unless the DHCP server is enabled.
Test a phone like this, assuming you have a power brick for the phone. Remove the network connection from the MBU. Plug a phone, set for DHCP into the bottom 8P8C jack on the MBU. If you have the internal DHCP server disabled, the phone shouldn't boot up. Then set the phone for static IP, set an address in the phone system's subnet and see if it connects. Do your wireshark traps looking for the 10.0.7 addresses. You shouldn't see any.
Can I get a copy of your data base?
Sometimes the thoughts in my head get so bored, they go for a stroll through my mouth. This is rarely a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30 |
I will do the test and double check the settings... thanks for checking in. I tried to send the db but the max file size is smaller the the db. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30 |
I performed the afrorementioned test: removed network connection from the mbu. INternal and all dhcp servers disabled. Phone did not connect to the system. However, upon switching it to static and [NOT] yet setting an IP address the system assigned it a 10.0.0.10 address. So where did it get that from. This test was just the phone and phone system. Nothing connected and dhcp i thought disabled. By that i mean in the programmer all of the DHCP fields have a zero in them. Is there actually a disable enable switch i should be looking for?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,526 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,526 Likes: 4 |
Some manufactures require the system to be rebooted after certain changes, could this be the case with your internal DHCP server?
We get old too soon, smart too late
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,812 Likes: 15
Moderator-Iwatsu
|
Moderator-Iwatsu
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,812 Likes: 15 |
Any time you make any kind of IP address change, reboot the phone system.
The 10.0.0.10 address is the default-out-of-the-box IP address on the phone IIRC. Reboot the phone switch, configure the phone with an IP address of 80. whatever and try the test again.
Run the SNMP diagnostic report so you can see what IP addresses phones are using. Pay particular attention to subnet and gateway. I'm thinking you have a route issue back to the phone system. Phone reboots are usually caused by 1) Losing the TCP connection to the switch; 2) Losing power to the phone. If you're using PoE switches, that could indicate a failing switch or bad ports.
Where have you told things about VLAN tagging? It needs to be either 'tagged' to a VLAN number everywhere, or not tagged at all. The best filtering method for a VLAN with this equipment is to make it related to Iwatsu MAC addresses to keep unwanted aquipment out of the way.
PM sent regarding data base.
Sometimes the thoughts in my head get so bored, they go for a stroll through my mouth. This is rarely a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 202
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 202 |
Would love an update on this. Did you ever find the problem?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 30 |
Thank you to all who have offered knowledge to this case. We have yet to determine the cause. IWATSU and the phone vendor insist that the issue lies with the network but have thus far failed to pinpoint the exact cause. Myself and other experts indicate that the network has been eliminated base on the 7 layer OSI model and insist that it is the phone system. So, no resolution yet! Thank you. We are going to redesign the IP network this month and see if that puts it in order. Short of that and physically separating the phone and network we have no answers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1 |
I registered here just so I could chime in and say "me too" I know this is an old thread, but it did help us so I wanted to contribute my 2ยข too.
We have IWATSU IP phones hanging off our main phone system and started seeing the same "wonky" behavior when they were moved to another building. We had a couple in service that worked fine for years on a /16 subnet (255.255.0.0) getting addresses from DHCP in the old building.
Once we moved the phones to a new building (different subnet, same network, no firewalls only routers in between so no traffic gets blocked) they starting having issues.
For us the phones would get an IP address from DHCP but could not contact the phone system. You could ping the phone from anywhere (same building, building with the phone system, etc) but they just wouldn't talk to the phone system!! After looking at this post (and talking to Iwatsu support) setting the phones to a static IP address fixed them right up! Even if we gave them the same address they were getting from DHCP! I think something is busted in the IWATSU phone's network stack but that's nothing we could fix.
Another odd coicidence was that the subnet at the new building was also a /23 subnet (just like the original poster). Maybe these phones break when getting a non-class A,B,C subnet from a DHCP server??
I think it's rubbish that we have to statically assign IP addresses, but at least we have a work around.
--Andrew Duey Network Engineer
Last edited by Andrew Duey; 08/04/16 01:35 PM.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,521
Posts639,995
Members49,851
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
133
guests, and
54
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|