|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,356 Likes: 4
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,356 Likes: 4 |
The higher the release the newer it is. What's the difference between releases of expansion modules? I don't think any of that was ever documented. I have to assume production and engineering changes that aren't of any real consequence to operation, although I do seem to recall early 206ECs (I think) had a problem with conferencing (I think again). Anybody remember that?
-Hal
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,310 Likes: 8
Moderator-Avaya, Polycom
|
|
Moderator-Avaya, Polycom
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,310 Likes: 8 |
Hal, I could be wrong but I think it was the 206, I think the 206EC corrected that and a few other issues. The 308 came out right after that. Within months I think.
Alot of I thinks in there.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,356 Likes: 4
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,356 Likes: 4 |
The 206 was the original Partner. Could be used by itself or with another to expand to 4x12. Later the 206E was introduced with the Partner Plus and Partner II. That was a straight expansion module as neither the Partner Plus or II had any provisions for lines or extensions. The 206EC enabled CID and that came along with the introduction of the ACS. Then came the 308EC. No, I believe it was an early release of the 206EC that had that problem.
-Hal
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,526
Posts640,016
Members49,852
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
0 members (),
131
guests, and
45
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
