|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 599 Likes: 1
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 599 Likes: 1 |
Other than the price, what is the big difference between an OAS and MGI64. Looks like I get the same number of channels for IP phones. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,014
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,014 |
If memory serves me correctly, you don't need to buy licenses for the OAS but you do for the MGI 64.
John 807
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 602
Samsung Moderator
|
Samsung Moderator
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 602 |
You don't need licenses for either. The big difference is the OAS supports MPS, the MGI does not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 681
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 681 |
Also the OAS is only 16 MGI channels. So depending on the application that you are trying to do. An MGI 64 is a lot of channels for a system. Normally you wouldn't need that many. What's the scenario you got?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,014
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,014 |
Hmmm. I'll have to back through some invoices, I'm pretty sure I got bamboozled into buying MGI licenses for an OS7400 with MGI 64's.
John 807
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 681
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 681 |
No, the MGI64 comes with 64 set MGI channels. It's an overkill card honestly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 599 Likes: 1
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 599 Likes: 1 |
Biztel, quoting a 7400 with 30 digital sets, pri, and may have about 5-10 remote IP phones in the future. So looks like the OAS is the way to go. Thanks all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 681
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 681 |
Have you looked into doing that with a 7200? You will drop the price and be able to expand for even less than a 7400 would. The 7200 would be able to accommodate all of that and more.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics93,879
Posts636,998
Members49,673
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
15
guests, and
15
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|