|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 880 Likes: 1
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 880 Likes: 1 |
I've got our in-house SV9100 running with a dozen IP phones on our LAN, everything been working great for a few weeks. Now I'm trying to add a remote IP phone and am having all kinds of trouble.
I've narrowed it down to when I assign our routers WAN IP (public IP) to 10-12-07 'NAPT Router IP Address' for some reason this causes the inside phones on the LAN to loose connection with the 9100. If I set 10-12-07 back to default 0.0.0.0 the phones reconnect and all's well.
Why does this affect the phones on the LAN?
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,227 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,227 Likes: 2 |
It shouldn't. Never seen that before. Do you have your internal phones setup correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 880 Likes: 1
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 880 Likes: 1 |
I got it working, watching the training video for SL2100 remote IP helped, same steps...
I had to add the local area network to 10-58 (networks to exclude from NAT). I also forgot to set all IP phone for NAT plug-and-play in 15-05. Not sure why the phones on the same LAN as the SV9100 would be set for NAT plug/play but its working. Now the local phones are ok and the remote IPT registered and works.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,227 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,227 Likes: 2 |
10-58 for whatever reason by NEC should be set with all 3 network types as standard. No idea why they ship that way.
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,562
Posts640,147
Members49,863
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
0 members (),
41
guests, and
77
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
