Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#145128 11/12/09 01:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 15
skwirl Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 15
Here's my problem. It only occurs about 30% of the time.

MICS 5.0 and a PRI.
NAM 4.0.04C with 4 channels.

I have outbound transfer set up on a phone for customer initated transfer to a cell phone by pressing 7.

When it works this is how it goes:
1. Call rings in.
2. After 2 rings, FNA to the NAM.
3. At the desk phone I hear the V-mail xfer "da-duh" sound and see the caller ID.
4. The caller hears the greeting and presses "7".
5. The caller hears the "boop-boop" of being placed on hold.
6. The call rings to the cell phone.

When it fails:
1. Call rings in.
2. After 2 rings, FNA to the NAM.
3. At the desk phone I hear the V-mail xfer "da-duh" sound and see the caller ID.
4. The caller hears the greeting and presses "7".
5. The caller hears the "boop-boop" of being placed on hold.
7. The "da-duh" xfer sound is presented at the desk phone again along with the caller ID.
8. The call drops.

Any ideas on why it sometimes fails? I was able to have all of the involved equipment in the room with me so I know the cell phone had service. Why is the v-mail xfer tone presented again at the desk phone when the call fails?

skwirl

Atcom VoIP Demo
VoIP Demo
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 4
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 4
Traditional outbound transfer uses a 2nd line and conferences the two lines together.

The outbound transfer failed because A) the outbound transfer channel(s) were busy or B)there were no lines available in the line pool. Try increasing the number of available channels.

Better would be to set up the transfer as a Centrex type transfer using a hook flash as the 1st digit in the dial string, if the lines are equiped with the feature. It will always work as you are using the same channel and line as the one the call is already on. It also frees the line once transfer is completed.


Marv CCNA, CTUB
TeleMarv Services (Retired)
Providing telecommunication solutions in Ottawa Canada since 1990
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 173
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 173
I'm thinking your NAM should be a 4.1 for MICS5


Moderated by  MooreTel, NTlayoff 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics93,880
Posts637,004
Members49,673
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
Today's Birthdays
briguy, Eddie Mac, Georg Andreev, kate85034, rodapech, Stormin Protection
Newest Members
APInc, m1cashman, jonnycom, XJR9000, BitBang
49,673 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 11
teleco 6
jsaad 6
dexman 5
Shahza 4
tim10 4
Who's Online Now
3 members (newtecky, mtncomm1, Carl Navarro), 81 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: Business Phone Systems | Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers.
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998-2023
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5