|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10 |
I recently upgraded a MICS with a 8 port NAM from T1 to 7.1 software. All programing was documented before change out. The situation is an outside line appears and rings on four sets with one of those forwarding to voicemail after four rings. This set has a mailbox but the forward goes to the main auto attendant greeting. The line in question is set to no answer in NAM. Any ideas on how to make the call go direct to the sets mailbox?
|
|
|
Nortel Phone System Service in Canada
Do you need a Nortel Phone System technician or specific Nortel parts?
Atcom to the rescue! Our telephone techs have qualified experience servicing and troubleshooting Nortel CICS, MICS, & BCM telephone systems.
Service in Canada from sea to sea.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,732 Likes: 2
Moderator-Nortel, Computers, General
|
|
Moderator-Nortel, Computers, General
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,732 Likes: 2 |
Has that extension's MB been initialized?
You could try and remove the CFNA from that set. It should go to the mailbox anyway.
Scientists say that the universe is made up of Protons, Neutron & Electrons. They forgot "Morons".
Dave. (CTUB) Canadian Techs Use Bix!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10 |
The mailbox works fine with an intenal call. It's outside calls thats the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,615
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,615 |
If CFNA is set to 4 rings then make sure AA is set to N.
DRT and Transfer Call backs are set to 6 or higher.
What is the line/s number in programming you are dealing with?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10 |
It is 061.I adjusted the DRT and call back timers and set AA to no in greeting 1 with the same result. The call forwards to the auto attendant greeting, not the mailbox. m out of ideas except for making a new CCR tree which the boss's don't want.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,685 Likes: 4
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,685 Likes: 4 |
How did you you upgrade the MICS? Did you upgrade the NAM too? NAM needs to be 4.1 to integrate correctly with a MICS 7.x.
Did you reinit the NAM or are you relying on the previous set up of the NAM? Port numbering change with a large upgrade like this. The previous setup will be unpredictable.
Marv CCNA, CTUB
TeleMarv Services (Retired)
Providing telecommunication solutions in Ottawa Canada since 1990
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,284
Posts638,773
Members49,765
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
2 members (BobRobert, Yoda),
172
guests, and
170
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image from telcopc.ca]](https://telcopc.ca/files/pics/small-logo-sig.png){kind=logo}
