|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,648
RIP Moderator-Nisuko-Tie, General
|
RIP Moderator-Nisuko-Tie, General
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,648 |
Originally posted by hbiss: I ran high quality cat 5...
:rofl: :rofl:
CAT 5 in the same topic as Trimline is blasphemy!
-Hal yea but Hal , he may need that cat5 to the bathroom for a "data dump " sometime 
Skip ------------------------------------
Serving SW and West central Fl since 1984
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 329
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 329 |
Is that catological humor?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 741
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 741 |
lol
I say high quality as the conductors are thicker than normal; I'd say about as thick as the cross connect wire.
Maybe it's cat5E, dunno. But the wires are definately thicker.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,354 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,354 Likes: 4 |
CAT 5, CAT 5e etc. is always 24 ga, has to be to maintain it's specs for data. I saw someplace that some CAT 6 is 23 ga.
It's CAT 3 and non-catagory that can be had in 22 ga or larger. Cross connect wire is normally 24 ga.
-Hal
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,059 Likes: 6
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
|
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,059 Likes: 6 |
I ran ITT shielded Cat 6 and it was 23 AWG. When I worked for GTE our House cable (Vertical Side of the frame) was 24 AWG, and our Switch cables (Horizontal side)were 24 AWG, but our X-connect wire was 22 AWG. Engineering felt that this was a potential weak point that had to be addressed. And the xconnects were wire wrapped - not punched down.
There is something to be said for an outfit that stressed quality.
Sam
"Where are we going and why are we in this hand basket?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,429 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,429 Likes: 3 |
Jeff Moss Moss Communications Computer Repair-Networking-Cabling MBSWWYPBX, JGAE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290 |
our Switch cables (Horizontal side)were 24 AWG, but our X-connect wire was 22 AWG. Engineering felt that this was a potential weak point How did they arrive at the reasoning that a thicker wire was a weak point? And weak in what way?
Arthur P. Bloom "30 years of faithful service...15 years on hold"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,393 Likes: 17
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
|
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,393 Likes: 17 |
Arthur:
I think that Sam was referring to the use of anything smaller than 22 gauge would be a weak point.
My guess would be that frame wire endures quite a bit of stress due to long runs and being tugged by other jumpers that are entangled with it. Not to mention that it has more tensile strength when it's run for hundreds of feet.
Then of course, there's always the concern that the tension placed upon it when being wrapped can cause it to fracture without it being detected right away. Frame blocks don't provide the individual "per-pair" fanning strips like 66 blocks do, so the jumper conductors really have to fend for themselves with regard to stress and movement.
I don't think that I've ever seen frame wire that wasn't 22 gauge. As if I'm telling you anything that you didn't already know. :p
Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 741
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 741 |
I looked at the jacket, it's 24 ga.
It's all I had at the time, Ed's gonna hook me up.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,059 Likes: 6
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
|
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,059 Likes: 6 |
Ed -
You're right, the engineers felt that the weak point in the circuit was the xconnect so they boosted the wire size to give it more strength.
We were required to use the appropriate cutting/stripping tools for wire wrapping so that cut down on the cracked wire, but there were always some guys who insisted on stripping with their pliers, dykes, shears etc. Even while they were looking at a set of strippers hanging on the frame.
I think we did have per pair fanning strips on the old Newton bakelite Blocks, but maybe those were just for the house/switch cables and not for the xconnect. My memory is fading on some of those things.
Sam
"Where are we going and why are we in this hand basket?"
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,490
Posts639,857
Members49,833
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
607
guests, and
20
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|