web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#38714 02/20/08 10:01 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10
Ok, what I am encountering is a problem trying to find an acceptable trade off in balancing the Pad levels to accommodate the loss encountered when there is a trunk to trunk transfer during CFOS applications. Whenever the two CO's are bridged, there is a significant signal loss that I cannot find a suitable PAD level adjustment for the customer that does not effect the other applications of the trunks. Does anyone know of any tricks that might give me greater amplification? :bang:


Gary Golding
Senior technician
Phoenix Communications & Cabling
Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

#38715 02/23/08 06:49 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,552
Moderator-Comdial, ESI, Voicemail, Cisco
Offline
Moderator-Comdial, ESI, Voicemail, Cisco
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,552
I've not found any. Unless it's a PRI, I don't like messing with padding levels. If the analog line is too hot or too soft, I try to go back to the telco to resolve it, rather than choking down or amplifying the problem. I doubt you're going to find a good balance to resolve this. Analog lines are imperfect by nature, and pairing them together simply multiplies the imperfections exponentially. If you tweak the padding levels where they make your CFOS sound better, most likely it's going to have a negative affect on regular calls. I suggest trying to find a solution through voicemail and Centrex transfers. CFOS is a great feature when you're using PRI. Aside from that, it's hit and miss to make it sound good. The same applies to conference calls and trunk to trunk transfers.

One other pad you could try adjusting, if you're going to try anyway, is the Conference Pad Level in Sys. Parameters. I don't know for sure that it will have an affect on CFOS, but it might be worth a shot.

Justin

#38716 02/27/08 03:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 42
nah Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 42
I have never had any luck either by adjusting every pad level and/or turning on Conference Pad Level in sys programming. I never give the option for CFOS when using POTS lines.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,289
Posts638,796
Members49,767
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
212,352 Shoretel
189,016 CTX100 install
187,393 1a2 system
Newest Members
Robbks, A2A Networks, James D., Nadisale, andreww
49,767 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 21
teleco 6
dexman 5
jsaad 3
dans 3
Who's Online Now
4 members (nfcphoneman, Yoda, justbill, Toner), 122 guests, and 405 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998-2024
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5