web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20
Strangely enough all fax's work on ports 215 and 216, but not 213 or 214. I think you must be right about the pinout, I suspect a cross between the first two pairs.

I'll check out the install manual and MDF wiring and report back.

Thanks for your help with this - much appreciated.


Best Regards - Jake
DataSwift Network Services Ltd
www.dsns.co.uk
Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20
I checked the pin out for the SLT RJ 45. The guys had done the job according to the manual:

Pin 1 - Tip 213
Pin 2 - Tip 214
Pin 3 - Tip 215
Pin 4 - Tip 216
Pin 5 - Ring 216
Pin 6 - Ring 215
Pin 7 - Ring 214
Pin 8 - Ring 213

This looks odd on the MDF as; 213 connects to OW/BrW, 214 connects to O/BrW while pairs are retained for 215 (GW/G) and 216 (Bl/BlW).

I suspected a misprint, so have experimented with pairs OW/O and BrW/Br, but these do not even produce a tone so I guess the manual is correct.

So I'm still at the same impass 213 and 214 work ok as outgoing lines for faxes, but can not receive (or try to receive, but the calling station still gets the ring tone as if the lines have not been answered).

The problem now is that I need to configure these lines to link into a voice mail/aa system and I've still got the same issue.

Could it be something to do with these circuits being configured as Off Premise Extension OPX connections, or do you think that there may be a minor board fault on this system?


Best Regards - Jake
DataSwift Network Services Ltd
www.dsns.co.uk
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 391
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 391
Also, I didn't see it posted yet, but you need to plug in your butt set to the analog port and call the number and make sure that the port is ringing. You said it "seems" like they are ringing. You want to make sure. Because there are some parameters that you need to assign for the analog ports to ring. I dont know if you have done that yet. If you haven't then let me know and I will go get the manual and tell you what MMC it is.


www.A1Bizcom.com
Specializing in selling and installing new and used Samsung systems
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 7
pvj Offline
Moderator-Executone-Isoetec, Samsung
*****
Offline
Moderator-Executone-Isoetec, Samsung
*****
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 7
Parameters for the sli ports to ring?Not sure what you mean by that,if you call the extension it will ring.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 756
Likes: 2
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 756
Likes: 2
Check the manual, I think you can change the way the port ring, ICM,CO.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 7
pvj Offline
Moderator-Executone-Isoetec, Samsung
*****
Offline
Moderator-Executone-Isoetec, Samsung
*****
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 7
True you can choose icm or co type ringing but that shouldn't affect the fax machines unless they were ident a call compatable.Even then ,the fact they worked on the 2 other ports says to me that the first 2 sli ports were bad sine he said they were wired correctly.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 30
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 30
I believe the trouble to still have to do with splitting the pairs of ext 213 & 214. As mentioned, 215 and 216 work fine - if you are using a 568B Cat5 patch cord as an interface cable, the green and blue pairs will not be split. However, you mentioned that 213 was connected to orange white / brown white. If, as I suspect, you have used a 568B cord as an interface cable, extension 213 should connect to white orange / brown white with extension 214 using orange white / white brown.

If the pairs are split between these two extensions it it very possible for outgoing to work but incoming to fail. If you call a display phone from either of these extensions do the extension numbers report correctly?

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20
Aardvark. You were correct about the crossover (though the 568B vs 568A cable didn't make a lot of difference).

213 was connected to pin 1 and 7 (White Orange and White Brown).

214 was connected to pins 2 and 8 (Orange White and Brown White.

Sorry guys - this was a dumb mistake and I should have picked it up earlier. Thanks for all of your help and sorry for wasting the time.


Best Regards - Jake
DataSwift Network Services Ltd
www.dsns.co.uk
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  nameless, pvj 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,291
Posts638,815
Members49,767
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
212,400 Shoretel
189,145 CTX100 install
187,423 1a2 system
Newest Members
Robbks, A2A Networks, James D., Nadisale, andreww
49,767 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 26
teleco 6
dexman 5
jsaad 4
dans 3
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 175 guests, and 429 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998-2024
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5