|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 27
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 27 |
I can't seem to find an answer to this problem. I have 2 users that receive voice mails late. The email I received this morning stated that themessages were waiting for him this morning but were actually left last Monday. I have checked on him several times to make sure this was not an ID10T error. We have an office serv 7200 system. the vneodr I purchased the system has never run into this problem before.
Thanks, Scott
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218 |
Scott,
What testing has your vendor done? If your vendor hasn't done any testing, I would suggest they look at Port Activity while someone leaves a message for the users reporting the problem.
I would also ask them to look at the activity log. It's a little hard to read, but that should give them a starting place.
Feel free to contact me via PM if you need more help.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 232
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 232 |
Scott Any chance this is just an adjustment needed on the Voice mail system Time? Perhaps it's set wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218 |
The voicemail on an OS7200 gets its time information from the system, so there is no way to adjust just the time on the voicemail stamp.
With that said... have you verified the date and time on the system?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,173
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,173 |
Extra undocumented feature.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 27
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 27 |
Date and time is fine. But sometimes messages are getting delayed up to a week. My vendor is telling me they have spoken to Samsng and that this problem has NEVER been seen before. I don't believe that for a second. I feel like I am stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Thanks, Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62 |
The key thing is to monitor the email under port activity. That will tell you where the issue will be. Whether it is the voicemail delaying the email or the email provider. I get delay with my provider alot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218 |
Scott,
Could you please provide a few details. I don't think you are talking about the e-mail gateway, but let's make sure.
Also... I gave you some suggestions above to either check yourself or have your vendor check. If you or your vendor will monitor the port activity... you will get your answer.
I have been a Samsung tech for a few years and I've never seen this problem... unless you are talking about e-mail notification.
Feel free to send me a PM and I can discuss this with you further.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 326
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 326 |
Delete and re-create the mailbox(s).
~ Marty Sometimes there ARE ghosts in the machine. I use MSN Live, ask me for the addy if you want. Never, ever, argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience http://www.vernontelecom.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,173
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,173 |
I agree with Vernon Telecom, delete the mailbox and recreate it. It that doesn't not work, pull the storage medium and have a Windows PC run scandisk/repair on it as well as defrag.
Yes this problem has been around for years dating back to the first SVMi4s. Nearly impossible to track down because it is so intermittent. When you watch it via the port activity it will most like be fine.
It is not just that the message does not light the message waiting light. The message is just not there, and then 'poof' it appears the next day or worse, a few days later. The timestamp is correct. It just wasn't there before.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,516
Posts639,970
Members49,848
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
154
guests, and
39
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|