|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512 |
Could high audio level from the telco make the PBX user cutout on the TX side of a call. Outside call comes in on analog trunk ShoreTel user answers. Coversation is find at low levels but if the outside caller raises voice to medium high level the ShoreTel user cuts out when they speak at the same time. There are no other issues but this seemingly half duplex issue. If the db level and loop current is to high on the line for the spec's of the Shoretel system wouldnt the high db level step on the TX side (ST user).
So I would like to reduce the db/loop current on the line. Wouldn't reducing the loop current reduce the db level also and or reducing db level reduce loop current. I haven't tested the lines yet, but I think this is what is happening. What else may cause half duplex issues?
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,747 Likes: 37
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,747 Likes: 37 |
What is the loop current? Yes reducing loop current will reduce volume some. The clipping would be more of a condition of the IP phone system than the analog line. At least in my opinion. Test from DEMARC to prove this and let us know the off/hook and on/hook voltage and the loop current.
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512 |
I agree that its probably the ST system. But I have to change the line to meet the VOIP system spec's, that is just the nature of the beast there is no settings I can adjust on the ST system. I will update with test findings.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,747 Likes: 37
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,747 Likes: 37 |
If the loop current is high you can get loop current regulators from Sandman. If there are other places to get them I'm not aware of it. At least the constant ones. I have found those with different taps, but not near as handy. I'd certainly like to find a less expensive source.
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,747 Likes: 37
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,747 Likes: 37 |
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 512 |
Yeah I was looking at that site. I found the loop current regulator, echo stopper and the telephone line attenuator. I'm thinking the line attenuator looks like it will be my best choice. Since it reduces the db and loop current at the same time. I just hope that is the issue?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 860 |
Originally posted by justbill: The clipping would be more of a condition of the IP phone system than the analog line. ^^^^ What Bill, said. Is the analog signal and loop current really THAT high at the demarc? Did you test there as Bill suggested? ... And If you’re are going to attenuate for louder conversation what’s going to happen to normal conversation volumes or worse yet for quiet talkers? ... Just something to think about there.
----------------------- Bryan LEC Provisioning Engineer Cars -n- Guitars Racin' (retired racer Oct.'07)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290 |
Telephony is a a science that follows established electrical rules. There ain't any magic here. There are three ways to evaluate and solve telephone circuit problems.
1. measurements
2. substitution
3. hand-waving
As has been suggested, please measure the loop current. Then please tell us what it is. Then we will help you.
Can you substitute an incoming line using some other, proven, (read: non-voip nonsense) technology? Is there a POTS line within wiring distance of the KSU in the building (even if can be temporarily borrowed from a co-operative neighbor)?
Without knowing base-line factors, and comparing them to industry standards; and without eliminating the various parts of a suspect circuit, the rest is hand-waving.
Arthur P. Bloom "30 years of faithful service...15 years on hold"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290 |
And If you’re are going to attenuate for louder conversation what’s going to happen to normal conversation volumes or worse yet for quiet talkers? An engineer should not suspect that turn of events. High loop current is not a linear problem.
Arthur P. Bloom "30 years of faithful service...15 years on hold"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 860
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 860 |
Originally posted by Arthur P. Bloom: And If you’re are going to attenuate for louder conversation what’s going to happen to normal conversation volumes or worse yet for quiet talkers? An engineer should not suspect that turn of events. High loop current is not a linear problem. “Loop current†would be measuring the DC component of what is found on a phone line. Georg Ohm figured out the directly proportional (linear) relationship of voltage and resistance back in the early 1800’s. A voice signal transmitted over a copper wire is a sinusoidal waveform (AC) positioned on top of the DC component. So now if you meant the “voice signal†that is measurable in decibels, is a non-linear (logarithmic) scale, that would in fact be true. I think I’ll stand by my concern, since in this case, it would seem an attenuator of any kind would be masking a symptom rather the correcting the issue.
----------------------- Bryan LEC Provisioning Engineer Cars -n- Guitars Racin' (retired racer Oct.'07)
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,531
Posts640,040
Members49,852
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
193
guests, and
40
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|