|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11 |
I didn't reboot the 5000 after the NAT setting change. Makes sense that I probably should have. I'll have to try that tonight.
Regarding SoCalJake's suggestions, I have two home sites now with Intertel phones, one with a cheap consumer grade router, and my home, which has a Linksys RV082. Both yield the same one-way audio results without VPN. Phone server LAN IP is 10.10.10.60 and the home phones are 192.168.x.x. For the office firewall, we have dual WAN through different ISPs and I've tried routing the home phones through IP addresses of both ISPs. I do still have 1:1 NAT left to try.
It's seeming more and more that it's a route selection issue at this point. Rebooting the 5000 tonight seems like the best next step. I'll post results tonight/tomorrow.
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11 |
I rebooted the 5000 last night, but we still have the same results. The 5000 looks for a locally defined route to accept the audio stream coming from the home phone. One home phone has a 192.168.1.x address, which is the same subnet as one of our branch offices that maintains a VPN to our main phone server's location. I suppose I could switch her router to run on a different subnet. It really seems that NAT is broken...or else we really do need to have every home phone on a different subnet.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,514
Posts639,941
Members49,845
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
1 members (justbill),
159
guests, and
33
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|