|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 328
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 328 |
Yes, it works fine on the single line ports too.
Instructions are just one man's opinion on paper
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,834 Likes: 25
Retired Admin
|
|
Retired Admin
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,834 Likes: 25 |
Following the instructions provided by Panasonic Tech Support, the TDA50can be configured to "somewhat" comply with Kari's Law. I have set up a TDA 50 system that used to have auto CO hunting and will no longer access an outside line when the handset is lifted. When a line button is pressed, access is not allowed. I assume that it is looking at the digits being dialed, before it selects a trunk group and dials out. The customer does not like this AT ALL. Old habits, you know. I am wondering if auto co hunt at all extensions, is considered compliant???? You are NOT required by Federal Law to update Legacy Multi-line Telephone Systems. For more information read this post.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,354 Likes: 4
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,354 Likes: 4 |
You are NOT required by Federal Law to update Legacy Multi-line Telephone Systems. For more information read this post.Well, even though the system qualifies as a legacy system and does not have to be made compliant, Panasonic did a disservice by coming out with an update to address the issue. So now, if someone is injured, the owner can't use the "legacy system" defense because there is a fix. If the owner didn't install it to make the system compliant, the injured party's lawyer will argue that it was available and should have been installed. If it was, his client wouldn't have suffered a delay in response and the consequences because of it. Likely there will be a large settlement for the defendant against the owner. So, Panasonic and other manufacturers need to leave it the hell alone or their customers need to be made aware that they MUST upgrade their systems if a fix is made available! -Hal
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 345 Likes: 1
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 345 Likes: 1 |
I believe that part of the reason that Panasonic came out with the firmware fix, was that they wanted to continue to sell the TDA after the Feb compliance date. The ARS fix, seems to be just a fast work around so that you don't have to do a full upgrade which may or may not require re-registering the system.
The Cloud is just someone else's computer!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 63
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 63 |
Has the Ray Baum portion of this law been addressed? Most of my customers have fewer than 5 lines and less than 10 phones. They do not have security guards or receptionists to manage the "notification" rule. Auto repair shops, glass shops, fire stations, real estate offices, etc. The site notification would have to trigger an alarm that notified all phones throughout the facility. Maybe use the contact closures or paging features??
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,491
Posts639,864
Members49,836
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
0 members (),
282
guests, and
126
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
