|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,951 Likes: 2
RIP
|
RIP
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,951 Likes: 2 |
Ipofficeguy IS right; the Magix cannot display Caller Name on a PRI, even if it's available from the carrier. Also, Group Ring on a Magix is limited to eight extensions and has even further limitations on Group Calling if it involves remote members. These are just a few of several (small, but nagging) areas where IP Office trumps Magix.
This is going to be a showdown between functionality and cost. In most cases I could make a case for Magix any day of the week and twice on Sunday. However, if the customer has specific needs that tax or exceed the limitations of the Magix, I don't see how BrianS would have any choice BUT to go with an IP Office.
"Press play and record at the same time" -- Tim Alberstein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,473
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,473 |
Hi Tim, this is right from Magix manual.
" The system also supports Calling Party Name, which is part of Caller ID. Calling Party Name does what its name suggests--it provides the name of the calling party. A button can be programmed on the multiline 4400-Series, MLX, TransTalk 9031/9040, Business Cordless 905, ETR, and MLS telephones to toggle between Calling Party Number and Calling Party Name. When the button's LED is lit, Calling Party Name and not Calling Party Number information appears and will continue to appear until you press the button again (the LED turns off)."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 9
Spam Hunter
|
Spam Hunter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 9 |
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the info that Vad listed above only applies to calls that arrive on caller ID enabled POTs lines. :confused:
I Love FEATURE 00
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254 |
Caller ID name will work with POTS lines, NOT PRI!
My name might imply I only know the IPO but I've installed and worked on plenty of Magix/Legends before the IPO came around.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 9
Spam Hunter
|
Spam Hunter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 9 |
I thought that might be the case. Thanks for clarifying! :thumb:
I Love FEATURE 00
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254 |
Also I am very aware of the parking features of a Magix AND the limitations of those features.
For the average business, a Magix is a very suitable system but like I said before, some of the features fo the Magix are too limited compared to the IPO for some customers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,473
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,473 |
From Rel.2.5 & later Avaya claims that Name is available if available from provider. That what I found in the Manual.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 254 |
From experience, IPO with PRI set to ATT Custom, shows Caller ID name and number. Plugged same PRI with no changes from provider into a Magix Rel 4, and no caller ID name. (even with using the toggle button)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 9
Spam Hunter
|
Spam Hunter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 9 |
I think the manual is talking about caller ID names being delivered on a regular POTs line. :confused:
I Love FEATURE 00
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,516
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,516 |
As Brian mentioned, a queing feature for the nurses' stations is his customer's most urgent need. Can queing be provided by either system?
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,518
Posts639,974
Members49,849
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
228
guests, and
45
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|