|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 62 |
Rick,
You said that on your remote IP phones you're using G711 as the primary codec. I'd go with G729A for the primary and no secondary. Select voice packet table 2. It's just a lighter codec for use over an internet connection. Unless of course, you've got some kind of crazy fast pipe on both ends. I also agree with TardianTechTexas..we don't even have Diffserv enabled at all where I'm at. Try turning it off.
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 89
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 89 |
Do yourself a favour and check the firmware version of the IPU card. Also, which card is it? BIPU, LIPU, or MIPU? Also upgrade the firmware on the sets. Also download pingplotter. Run it for a while when you are having problems. It will show you which router hop is being the bad boy (saved my butt a bunch of times). I had an LIPU that was causing me grief, I thought it was internet related, ran pingplotter, connection pretty good, upgraded the firmware and presto, problem gone!
Dave
Manager of technical services Mitel/Toshiba dealer for 25 years TAG member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32 |
Thanks, Rick
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32 |
Thanks for everyone's help. I have disabled diffserv, changed the phones to G729A and none for secondary on the phones and packet table 2 for the phones. I'll see tomorrow how people respond on the other end of the calls.
Canuckvoip, may be a little too much for me to upgrade firmware. We had the system installed 9/07 and in 8/08, the vendor installed the latest lipu card and software, I believe. I don't want to mess with that. We also had Toshiba involved. They blamed it on the internet just like our vendor.
Thanks, Rick
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,723 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,723 Likes: 7 |
I am deffinately going to try pingplotter, at least the freeware version. I love having a large arsenal of tools. Most are based on some type of ping or traceroute.
It is very common for Toshiba and vendors to say it is the connection. In most cases that is where the problem is at. Sometimes the internet connect just won't support a VoIP calls because of the delays or jitter.
Packet loss of 25% is pretty bad. There is definately a problem there. Sometimes I wll open another window and ping google.com as a baseline to see if the connection problem is closest to the side I am on. You can also ping the remote gateway. Since the system is on it's own internet it sould not be a problem with data traffic fighting for internet, unless you are downloading windows updates at the phone side while trying to talk.
Sometimes updating the firmware will help. The latest LIPU firmaware is 02_05D. It may be a bit much for the end user to update the firmware. That is why it is recommended for a Toshiba dealer to do it. If things go bad then they can call tech supoprt, while you can not.
I am a little puzzled about your Toshiba guy not wanting to disable Difserv. In your setup I see no benefit. If the devices on the network do not support QOS, the header is usually ignored, but there are rare occations where it can cause problems.
This type of troubleshooting is never easy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32 |
So, after 2 years of awful voice quality on our phones, so far so good today and ping to phone has been 20-30ms.
Yesterday's changes include: dedicated cable modem (5/800K) for phones system, disable diffserv and ip phones get - packet table 2, g729a codec and none for secondary codec.
Fingers crossed for future success.
Thanks to all, so far.
Thanks, Rick
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 32 |
What do g711 and g729a represent and what are the differences?
Thanks, Rick
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,017
Former Moderator-Toshiba, Request an Installer
|
Former Moderator-Toshiba, Request an Installer
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,017 |
Compression ratio's. g711 is a higher compression,uses more bandwidth and usually gives better voice quality. g729 is a lower compression, uses less bandwidth and in some cases will provide poorer voice quality.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397 Likes: 18
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
|
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397 Likes: 18 |
These represent compression levels. G711 requires a lot more bandwidth than G729. If you have the bandwidth available, the using G711 is preferred since there is less compression, thus less room for errors. G729 compresses the data packets more, requiring much less bandwidth per call. If the connection isn't ideal, there is the risk of unsatisfactory voice transmission when using G729.
Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397 Likes: 18
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
|
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,397 Likes: 18 |
Crossing paths again with replies. Sorry about that.
Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,518
Posts639,974
Members49,849
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|