Phone Systems

Sponsored by Atcom
Get a free phone!
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#239208 12/05/08 01:39 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
IPKII Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
OK, I have one...

First, does anyone know what is going on with the key system voice mail queu at the NTAC? I simply cannot get anyone on the phone or given an oppertunity to set up a call back! This has been goin off & on for a couple of weeks now. help


www.phonelinetech.com


"Can I Still Call Out?"
Atcom VoIP Demo
Get a VoIP Demo Today
#239209 12/05/08 03:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,458
Member
*****
Offline
Member
*****
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,458
IPK,
I'm sure you have but asking anyway, have you dialed the pager number using your butt set or phone,timed the length needed for the call back number to be entered and see what the timers are set in the Inmail setup?


We get old too soon, smart too late
#239210 12/06/08 11:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
IPKII Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
Yes, I have already played with that timer.

Btw, my SV8100 is at ver 2.0. I was informed by NTAC there is a bug regarding the internal modem on the PZVM-21 card.

If I could just get thru to the InMail guys...


www.phonelinetech.com


"Can I Still Call Out?"
#239211 12/08/08 09:52 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,458
Member
*****
Offline
Member
*****
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,458
IPK II,
Inmail introduced in the IPK II came from Intra mail of the Aspire side and I believe was developed by a company called CTL not Active voice. Since there are changes to Inmail with the SV8100 I guess it is possible Active voice got involved with it.


We get old too soon, smart too late
#239212 12/08/08 11:48 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,333
Member
*****
Offline
Member
*****
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,333
Quote
Originally posted by dans:
IPK II,
Inmail introduced in the IPK II came from Intra mail of the Aspire side and I believe was developed by a company called CTL not Active voice. Since there are changes to Inmail with the SV8100 I guess it is possible Active voice got involved with it.
I suspect unlikly. Talking to a AV guy from AU this year they seemed a little miffed that NEC had included the Inmail in the IPK2 and SV8100 system rathwr than their mails only..


Regards,

Paul W
Now back to a 0 day week. Love these 7 day weekends.
#239213 12/09/08 05:42 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Both InMail for IPK II and IntraMail for Aspire were developed in-house by NEC (AV is responsible for InMail NTAC only).

IPKII, how are you monitoring the CO Line?
When you say you're back in the same mailbox, what exactly do you hear from InMail at this point?

#239214 12/09/08 05:49 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
IPKII Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
I am monitoring the CO line with my butt-set. I hear the SV8100 go off-hook, dial the pager service, I hear the pager service answer, then I hear 2-3 seconds of MOH, then I hear the recorded name & canned prompt to leave a message in this same subscriber box. I never hear the SV8100 output the dial string from 47-01-07, which, I have also tried to manipulate, as well...

:bang:


www.phonelinetech.com


"Can I Still Call Out?"
#239215 12/09/08 06:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,458
Member
*****
Offline
Member
*****
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,458
I have worked on Vanguard mail sold for use on the Nitsuko product line and Prophet voice sold as generic, both used the same software developed by CTL. Intra mail also uses the same software and came to market 2 years before Inmail. NEC had to engineer their phone systems software to work with the Intra mail and Inmail software but they did not develop it.


We get old too soon, smart too late
#239216 12/09/08 07:47 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 369
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 369
When you are dialing the pager number, is the system going out a second trunk (trunk-to-trunk transfer), or are you using the telco's "Call transfer" (CENTREX) feature? The problem you are describing is identical to the issue I've run into where the customer subscribes to "Conference Calling" feature from the telco, but does not subscribe to "Call Transfer" or "Three way calling with transfer". Often times the customer has this feature on line one only.... not all of their lines.

Can you go across the line you were monitoring with your butt set, make a call to you cell phone, then transfer the call via the butt set to your office number? Does this test call work properly?


"I didn't do it, and I won't do it again"
#239217 12/09/08 07:53 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
IPKII Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 731
eriway, the 8100 is just grabbing a CO line from trunk group 1. It does sound like the system is trying to hook flash & transfer the call somewhere, but, why? This is just "simple" pager notification.


www.phonelinetech.com


"Can I Still Call Out?"
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  ttech 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics93,628
Posts635,876
Members49,589
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
Today's Birthdays
BizTelNancy, djboston, dougtech, girlie girl, Jack Damage, SwedaGuy, SynapticSystems, tkalfaoglu
Newest Members
TVCTech, joe angi, TommyKay, 電信小吳, Partswatch
49,589 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
dexman 10
Toner 8
Yoda 5
dans 5
Who's Online Now
1 members (bdunne), 139 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: Best VoIP Phones | Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers.
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998-2022
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5