|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23 |
I have a Mitel SX-200 with 2 Express Messenger cards installed. I discovered I cannot forward messages to users between cards. Is there a way to confuigure these cards to forward messages from a user on card 1 to a user on card 2? :confused:
Card 1 9109-080-008-NA (8 port) Card 2 9109-080-002-NA (4 port)
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,136
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,136 |
Are all ports on both cards (except the port you are using for notification) in the same hunt group?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,473
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,473 |
Make sure they have the same COS and Interconnect table allow them to communicate.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,136
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,136 |
Well since they are the same type of device thde "Device interconnect table" (Form 30) would not be an issue, but VAD makes a point - make sure they are either in the same Tenant or that "Tenant interconnection table" (Form 5) is not stopping the tenants from communicating.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,136 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,136 Likes: 1 |
I don't think that you can forward messages between to seperate express messenger cards. Why our you using 2 in the first place? If all users were on the same card then you could forward messages.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23 |
System would not allow me to put both cards in the same same hunt group. Can't remember the exact error but "group already in use" sounds familiar. All users on the 2nd card have to dial a different number to retrieve messages. After 243 users with mailboxes the 8 port Messenger card stopped allowing me to add mailboxes. It's possible that all ports on that card wasn't turned up/licensed and it was easier for the customer to get another card with ports already turned up versus turning up/licensesing the ports on the initial card. The only way to continue adding boxes was to add another card. Adding this 2nd card was suppose to be a tempoary fix but it's turned out to be permenent. They have just discovered the "forward" feature is no longer working.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,136
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,136 |
I think the limitation on the express messenger (at least the ones I worked with) was 250 users. If it wouldn't let you add new card exts to the original hunt group then that's a pretty good indication it's not going to let them talk. They could have put the new users and VM exts in a separate tenant and used the same access code (with some other finagling) but that wouldn't have solved your problem anyway. It makes sense that the system will not allow forwarding across cards since all the processes take place on that specific hard drive. There probably is a way to do something with setting up some speed dial stuff, but seems to me it's just easier to have someone listen to the message and then call correct party and leave the info on their mailbox.
Sorry couldn't be more help
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,057
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,057 |
There is no way to network 2 x express messengers together!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,136 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,136 Likes: 1 |
Didn't want to be the bearer of bad news, thanks 55-footer. Think he might be better off getting a real voice mail system. MEM is really limited IMHO. Hate that you can't forward a message to another box, and stop operator transfer at night.
You would think such thinks were commonplace, guess Mitel doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 23 |
Thanks for your help guys. Looks like the MEM has met its fate. We will look into replacing it with another VM system. The user will not be to happy about it as this system has been service for about 8 years. Guess I will chalk it up to growth and progress.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,521
Posts639,995
Members49,851
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|